🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.